Jump to
main body

Jump to
animations menu

Jump to
contents menu

Jump to
contents and animations menu

Jump to
main body

Return to top

The  Simple  Universe


Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Electric charge

Electric charge


In the Simple Universe model, electric charge is a consequnce of the direction of movement on the outer surface of a particle

This means, that in the model, all the particles are pieces of electric charge

The model achieves equal but opposite amounts of electric charge for the electron and the proton, by using a positron for the proton's internal positive electric charge


In the Simple Universe model, the particles of matter are torus shaped particles that are constructed using the model's elementary strand particle

The elementary strand particle is a particle that moves at a continuous single constant speed, against the model's static universal reference frame, in three dimensional space


The torus shaped electron has permanent internal movement in its sides that, depending on your direction of view, can be considered as either moving in the 'up' direction, or moving in the 'down' direction

And the torus shaped electron also has permanent internal movement in its circular torus that again, depending on your direction of view, can be considered as either moving in a 'clock-wise' direction, or moving in an 'anti-clockwise' direction


The positron has a similar structure to the electron, but the direction of the positron's permanent internal movement is different to the electron's permanent internal movement

The difference in the electron and positron's internal movement creates the concept of positive and negative electric charge in the model


In the model, when an electron and a positron have the same direction in their internal circular movements, then they have opposite directions in their internal side movements

And when an electron and a positron have the same direction in their internal side movements, then they have opposite directions in their internal circular movements


In the model, positive electric charge is defined as 'clock-wise' internal circular movement and 'down' side movement

Or if flipped 180 degrees, is defined as 'anticlock-wise' internal circular movement and 'up' side movement


And negative electric charge is defined as 'clock-wise' internal circular movement and 'up' side movement

Or if flipped 180 degrees, is defined as 'anticlock-wise' internal circular movement and 'down' side movement

The following animation shows a cutaway view of the shapes and structures of the model's subatomic particles, the  SloMo  button toggles the slow mode on / off, with slow mode on, moving the mouse over the animation will slow roll the animation forward, the  Particles  button steps through the particles, the  Run  button start / stops the animation (any of the buttons can be used in pause mode)

The Subatomic Particles

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Magnetic moments

Magnetic moments


When they are stationary, the electron and the proton in the Simple Universe model, have an even distribution of electric charge in their structures

It is when the electron and the proton move, that their structures form an uneven distribution of electric charge, and the electron and the proton gain magnetic moments


In the Simple Universe model, the particles of matter are torus shaped particles that are constructed using the model's elementary strand particle

The elementary strand particle is a particle that moves at a continuous single constant speed, against the model's static universal reference frame, in three dimensional space


In the model, when an electron moves forward, the electron's internal strand particles that are moving in the forward direction, bunch up on that side of the electron

And the internal strand particles that are moving away from the forward direction, stretch out on that side of the electron


As a suggestion, this uneven spatial distribution of electric charge in a moving electron, gives a moving electron in the model a magnetic moment


As a suggestion, this is also true for a moving proton in the model


When a proton in the model moves forward, the proton's internal strand particles that are moving towards the forward direction, bunch up in that part of the proton

And the internal strand particles that are moving away from the forward direction, stretch out in that part of the proton


This produces an uneven spatial distribution of the positive and negative electric charges that are inside the two 'neutral' particles of the proton, and as a suggestion, this gives a moving proton in the model a magnetic moment

The following animation shows the even spatial distribution of electric charge in a stationary proton and a stationary electron in the Simple Universe model, the  SloMo  button toggles the slow mode on / off, with slow mode on, moving the mouse over the animation will slow roll the animation forward, the  Move Forwards  button start / stops the particles moving forwards, the  Run  button start / stops the animation (any of the buttons can be used in pause mode)

Moving The Matter Particles

The following animation shows the uneven spatial distribution of electric charge in a moving proton and a moving electron in the Simple Universe model, the  SloMo  button toggles the slow mode on / off, with slow mode on, moving the mouse over the animation will slow roll the animation forward, the  Move Faster  button increases / stops the particles moving forwards, the  Run  button start / stops the animation (any of the buttons can be used in pause mode)

Moving The Matter Particles


For reference, here is a YouTube video (2021) that discusses the magnetic moment of the electron (from the YouTube channel Khan Academy)

Discussion of the magnetic moment of the electron

0 minutes   : an electron in an atom is like a loop of electric current

1 minutes   : atoms are like tiny magnets

3 minutes   : calculating the magnetic dipole moment of this tiny atomic magnet

4 minutes   : definition of electric current

10 minutes : the direction of the angular momentum

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Electric fields

Electric fields


The Simple Universe model has only one type of force-carrying particle, the model's electric field particle

This means that in the Simple Universe model, the model's electric field particles are required to be responsible for electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields


Put stuff in here

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Magnetic fields

Magnetic fields


The Simple Universe model has only one type of force-carrying particle, the model's electric field particle

This means that in the Simple Universe model, the model's electric field particles are required to be responsible for electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields


In the Simple Universe model, the particles of matter are torus shaped particles that are constructed using the model's elementary strand particle

The elementary strand particle is a particle that moves at a continuous single constant speed, against the model's static universal reference frame, in three dimensional space


In the model, the particles of matter emit their electric field particles in a periodic manner, via gaps that open and close on the surface of their torus rings


As a suggestion, when an electron in the model moves, the electron elongates its perfectly round torus shape

And emits its negative electric field particles in a more forward direction, rather than equally in all directions, as when it is stationary


As a suggestion, when a free electron travels down a wire, the free electron moves forwards in a circular loop that is aligned with the wire

Causing a higher proportion of negative electric field particles to emanate in a cone pattern that is aligned with the wire


And therefore, an unbalanced proportion of positive electric field particles in all of the other directions

The positive electric field particles come from the protons in the wire, which continue to emit their positive electric field particles equally in all directions


As a suggestion, some of the electrons in a magnet, move within the magnet in aligned parallel circular paths

This causes the magnet to show a negative electric field emanating parallel to the plane of the aligned circular paths, and a positive electric field in all of the other directions


As a suggestion, when an object that is overall neutral, has from each point within the object, a higher proportion of its negative electric field particles emitted parallel to a plane

Then the object has a magnetic field


For reference, here is a YouTube video (2020) that discusses how the path of a charged particle is affected when moving through a magnetic field (from the YouTube channel Khan Academy)

Discussion on the path of a charged particle moving through a magnetic field

0 minutes   : the direction of the force when a charged particle moves perpendicular to a magnetic field

7 minutes   : the direction of the force when the charged particle moves parallel to the magnetic field

8 minutes   : the direction of the force when the charged particle moves at an angle to the magnetic field

11 minutes : the auroras at the poles of the earth

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Gravitational fields

Gravitational fields


The Simple Universe model has only one type of force-carrying particle, the model's electric field particle

This means that in the Simple Universe model, the model's electric field particles are required to be responsible for electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields


Put stuff in here

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Strong nuclear force

Atomic nuclei

Put stuff in here


For reference, here is a YouTube video (2024) of Dr. Angela Collier discussing quarks and chromodynamics (from the YouTube channel acollierastro)

Discussion on quantum chromodynamics

0 minutes   : explain something simply

3 minutes   : the strong force

5 minutes   : gluons

6 minutes   : colour charge

9 minutes   : quantum mechanics

13 minutes : field theory

17 minutes : quarks and protons

19 minutes : Feynman diagrams

25 minutes : neutron decay

28 minutes : the weak force

29 minutes : quantum chromodynamics

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Spin

When a particle changes direction

Put stuff in here

Stern-Gerlach experiment

Put stuff in here


For reference, here is a YouTube video (2013) of Dr Bob Eagle discussing particle angular momentum and particle spin (from the YouTube channel DrPhysicsA)

Discussion on angular momentum and spin

0 minutes   : introduction to angular momentum and spin

6 minutes   : quantum angular momentum and quantum spin combined

8 minutes   : the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its commutative property

17 minutes : measuring quantum angular momentum

23 minutes : quantum angular momentum operator

38 minutes : quantum spin alignment states

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Waves

Uncertainty principle

Put stuff in here

Reflection

Put stuff in here

Refraction

Put stuff in here

Plane polarisation

Put stuff in here

Circular polarisation

Put stuff in here

Doppler shift

Put stuff in here

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Scale

Spectrum of light

Put stuff in here

Adjusting scale

Put stuff in here

Return to top

Close this pop-up window Go to top

The  Simple  Universe

Loose Ends Logic

Types of logic

Put stuff in here

The representation of things

Put stuff in here

Knowledge and understanding

Knowledge and understanding are similar to one another, but perhaps they are not always exactly the same as each other


For example, when asking why a weight falls to the ground, one could perhaps reply that the weight falls because the earth pulls on the weight

Such a reply answers what happens, which is knowledge, but only partially answers the why, for one could then ask why does the earth pull on the weight, and so on

It could be argued that it is not possible to ever fully answer a why question


However, I wonder if perhaps, like knowledge, for some why questions, it is possible to answer the why question completely

Return to top